Patent knowledge. Technology expertise. Market understanding.

Patent knowledge. Technology expertise. Market understanding.

Patent knowledge. Technology expertise. Market understanding.

Message

The Apple A5X versus the A5 and A4 – Big Is Beautiful

Much has been made of Apple’s ARM-based processors, and deservedly so.  Despite being a relative newcomer, they have consistently delivered industry leading performance where it counts for their phones and tablets. Better still, they have created a point of hardware differentiation in applications processors. In the early days of smartphone technology, the processor was almost an afterthought to the consumer, so this is good news for a group of companies working to drive up margins.

And the changes have been dramatic.

The Apple A4, which by all accounts is still commercially viable given the price of used Apple products on craigslist, measured in at 53.3 mm².  Only two (and a half?) generations later, we have the Apple A5X weighing in at 165 mm² – a whopping 3.1x larger. Remember that all three of the Apple processors we are comparing here are (basically) at the same 45 nm generation, so we have a genuine apples-to-apples comparison (sorry about the bad pun). By way of further comparison, another flagship applications processor, the NVIDIA Tegra 3 is 82 mm², and fabricated in a similar 40 nm generation by TSMC, so it is (more or less) consistent with the prior generation A5.

For the A5X, Apple has also changed packaging, away from what has been package-on-package with the DRAM to putting the DRAM physically on the other side of the board. This type of packaging has been reported to have (theoretical) disadvantages in BoM simplification because it is no longer one module and in performance because of the more routing between the chip and memory. However, we wonder if all the horsepower required to play wicked-awesome games on that high pixel-count screen hasn’t created potential heat issues that required the move to a new layout. Regardless, we expect that in the future, as Apple moves to newer lower power process technology at 32 nm and below (perhaps employing high-k metal gates) that we’ll see a return to PoP designs.

But lets get to the cool stuff.  A comparison of the sizes (scaled to relative actual size).

Apple A4 polysilicon die photo - scaledApple A4 Polysilicon Die Photo = 7.3 mm x 7.3 mm

Apple A5 Polysilicon Die Photo – 10.09 mm x 12.15 mm

Apple A5X Polysilicon Die Photo from iPad 3Apple A5x Polysilicon Die Photo – 12.90 mm x 12.79 mm

Now, polysilicon die photos are very cool – this we know. When you look at the weird fuzziness in the logic regions, you are not seeing sample preparation artifacts resulting from grinding off layers.  You are actually seeing the different densities of the tiny logic cells showing up as lighter and darker areas.

Chipworks clients get full resolution versions that, in the case of the Apple A5X, are 31 MB in total size when shot with optical imaging, or in tens of gigabytes when shipped as scanning electron microscope (SEM) mosaics. At these sizes, there is no fun, and since we provide these teardowns as a bit of entertainment, we thought that there would be a group of people out there interested in using the Apple A5X as their wallpaper/background on their new iPads.

Here are shots, free of block annotations, for you to work with (you will still need to do some manipulation to get it the way you want it).

–> Download high resolution A5X image for wallpaper (1200 px)

–> Download 2056 px tall version

This entry was posted in Computer / Tablet. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to The Apple A5X versus the A5 and A4 – Big Is Beautiful

  1. k says:

    Thank you for the great image! But.. Why don’t you provide a 2048×2048+ pixel image? That resolution would be appropriate for the new retina display.

    • rwilliamson says:

      We have added a 2056 (height) image to the A5X blog but retained the original image aspect ratio. People will still need to do some manipulation in order to make it the size they want, but the quality is now there.

  2. aaa says:

    Super cool!

  3. Iq says:

    Thanks to giving us teardown of Apple latest A5X processor. I am interested in the architecture itself such as the details on GPU core & ARM cortex9 core. Can you provide more details?

  4. shinobi says:

    Do you know the function of the WiFi/Video DAC/Audio blocks, which already can be seen on the A4?

    I guess e.g. the WiFi is not a full-blown WiFi transceiver, since the iPad has a separate WiFi module on the motherboard.

    Are these just interfaces towards third-party modules?

    • rwilliamson says:

      Hi – we are completing a Floorplan Analysis that will use available information and a comparison to past devices to annotate the blocks. Unfortunately, this level of detail won’t be published in a general blog at this time.

  5. Dave says:

    >>> a whopping 310% larger

    165 is 210% larger than 53.3.
    165 is 3.1 times as large as 53.3.

  6. pkgr says:

    any cross sections?

  7. Chrix says:

    From the images I’ve noticed that the A5 and A5X have identical A9 cores size. that means A5X is still fabbed in 45nm technology?

    • rwilliamson says:

      The A5X that we looked at is 45 nm technology. They may well shrink the process generation at some point during the life cycle. Since Apple doesn’t rely on Tom’s Hardware style performance specs to promote their products we can assume that we won’t hear from them if they do.

  8. flakefrost says:

    it’s interesting that the manufacturing process didn’t change. intels ivy bridge architecture is currently 22nm (i think). maybe the next apple processor (call it a6), could be smaller? but those things aside, i love my ipad, and i wouldn’t swap it for a $10,000 windows machine, EVER!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

View blog by...

Publication Date

Categories