Archive for the ‘MEMS’ Category

Invensense MPU-6000/6050 3-axis gyro, 3-axis accel, 9-axis ready

Thursday, September 22nd, 2011 by chipworks

Contributed by: St.J. Dixon-Warren 

The InvenSense MPU-6050 is InvenSense’s most recent motion sensor offering. The device promises an integrated six-axis sensor, incorporating a three-axis gyroscope and a three-axis accelerometer. It can also access an external magnetometer to provide complete 9-degrees-of-freedom sensing. Samples have arrived in the Chipworks labs, and we have some preliminary results. 

It looks like these parts are a success right out of the gate, with some speculation that it has design wins in some of the latest handheld gaming devices from Sony and Intel (http://www.varesano.net/blog/fabio/bad-news-mpu6000-and-mpu6050). 

The device comes packaged in a relatively small 4 mm x 4 mm x 0.9 mm QFN package (Figure 1). 

Figure 1. MPU-6050 package photograph

The side and plan-view x-rays confirm InvenSense’s claim that the device contains a single wire-bonded silicon chip (Figures 2 and 3). The chip appears to have been made using the Nasiri-fabrication process, previously analyzed by Chipworks (for example the discontinued InvenSense IDG-300). This process sandwiches the MEMS structures between a hermetic cap and an ASIC die. The process allows the fabrication of integrated single-chip motion sensors. 

Figure 2. MPU-6050 side-view package X-ray

The plan-view X-ray shows the connections to the die (Figure 3), disclosed on the device datasheet. Considering the sophistication of the device, surprisingly few pins are used. 

Figure 3. MPU-6050 plan-view package X-ray

Chipworks has decapsulated the die and is presently working to remove the hermetic lid that seals the MEMS structure. In the meantime, we took a peek through the lid using an infrared microscope. The microscope revealed the MEMS structures buried beneath the lid, in this case likely the X-axis accelerometer (Figure 4). In contrast to recently analyzed ST devices, such as the L3G4200D gyroscope, the MPU-6050 uses a separate sensor for each degree of freedom: acceleration along the X, Y and Z-axis and rotation around the X, Y and Z-axis. 

Figure 4. MPU-6050 X-axis acceleration sensor infrared photograph

Chipworks plans to continue with more detailed analysis of this sophisticated device. We will analyze the MEMS structures, including the fabrication process. We may also analyze a portion of the ASIC circuitry. 

From an intellectual property point of view, Invensense has a number of patents relating the MPU-6050’s technology, including: 

  • Multiple Axis accelerometer: US7,258,011, B2 (2007)
  • Integrated Motion Processing Unit (MPU) with MEMS inertial sensing and embedded digital electronics: US 2009/0007661 A1 (2009)
  • Integrated multiaxis sensor: US 2010/0071467 A1 (2010)
  • Vertically Integrated 3-axis MEMS accelerometer with electronics: US 2008/031417 (2008)
Related reports Reports available in the Chipworks Store  on the Invensense MPU-6050 include: 

Energy harvesting coming of age…

Friday, September 16th, 2011 by rwilliamson

…notes from the European Solid State Circuits Conference

contributed by Randy Torrance, Manager of Circuit RE

 

Energy harvesting may be the next big thing. At least, that’s the way it seems here at ESSCIRC/ESSDERC in Helsinki Finland this week. There are quite a few papers here discussing this new field, as well as a very well attended tutorial on the subject.

In the tutorial, Yiannos Manoli of IMTEK described energy harvesting technologies as those that create electrical energy from optical, thermal, kinetic, chemical, or RF energy. There are many strong reasons for this technology to take off, including:

  1. These types of energy sources are all around us, and are free for the scavenging.
  2. For portable devices, batteries have a limited lifetime, and can be quite heavy (33,000 tons of batteries were sold in Germany in 2008). They also have environmental issues at end of life.
  3. Non-portable applications still need to deal with a lot of wires to supply their power (a Porche 911 has 3km of cables in it). This adds complexity, weight, and reliability issues.
  4. There are actually many people with electronic devices, but nowhere to recharge them (for instance many more people in sub-Saharan Africa have cell phones than have electricity).

Some technologies are already in place for using this ambient energy. For instance, solar cells are becoming more heavily used (Samsung recently announced the first solar powered laptop). However so far commercial solar is only 12-13% efficient, so much more work can be done here. And of course, my 20 year old bicycle has a dynamo that powers my light from the kinetic energy of my turning wheel. But there are many more energy harvesting technologies just starting to make an impact.  Other potential applications are remote weather sensor networks, medical sensors, and we are seeing increasing use of RFID chips in smart card applications that use energy harvesting techniquues.

Scavenging kinetic energy is one of the active research areas, and many different transduction methods are available. Capacitive sensors are one way of capturing this energy. If one plate of the capacitor is fixed to the moving object, and the other plate is only loosely fixed (such as by a spring), then any acceleration causes a displacement of one plate with respect to the other. This causes the stored charge to either increase or decrease, and an electrical current results. This capacitor arrangement is already used in MEMs accelerometers (many Chipworks reports can give you an idea how these work), and this technology may be reusable to scavenge this kinetic energy. Piezoelectric transducers can also be used to convert kinetic energy into electrical. For instance, these can be inserted in running shoes to allow powering your iPod during your jog. Thermo-magnetic or inductive harvesters have also been built to harvest kinetic energy.

Rob Van Scheijk of IMEC and Gabriel Alfonso Rincon-Mora of the Georgia Institute of Technology spoke about some of the circuits used for energy harvesting. They reminded us that the real keys for these circuits are low voltage operation, low power consumption, and high efficiency. Low voltage operation is required due to the very low voltages that are available from some of these energy sources. Low power consumption and high efficiency are so that you don’t waste any more of the small amount of energy you are harvesting than needed. One other consideration is that AC-DC conversion is required for some of the technologies (for instance the MEMs capacitor with charge entering and leaving the capacitor). In that area rectifiers are often used. However, rectifiers require 2 diode drops, which is more voltage than is available from many of these sources. Rob showed some very interesting active rectifiers that avoided needing these diode drops. Impedance matching and frequency matching were key ingredients of these circuits.

Many other papers here at ESSCIRC have referenced energy harvesting as the way of the future. For instance, Jan Rabaey of UC Berkeley gave a very interesting talk on brain-machine interfaces. In it he noted that a device needs to be implanted in the brain to capture the signals from the neurons. Clearly batteries are not the optimal energy source here, so energy harvesting would be an excellent solution. The possibility may exist to use bio-fuel cells, which could convert glucose to electrical energy similarly to the way our bodies do.

Related Report: Linear Technology LTC3108 Ultra-Low Voltage Step-Up Converter and Power Manager This is a highly integrated DC-DC converter that can accept input voltages as low as 20mV and create outputs up to 5V. This is targeted as a thermal energy harvester optimized for thermoelectric generators, thermopiles, and small solar cells. I’m looking forward to see if any of the circuits that have been discussed here show up in this chip’s schematics.

Silverbrook Research’s technology inside the Memjet Rapid X1 printer

Friday, June 3rd, 2011 by admin

The Memjet Printhead: Like a tea kettle, not a hot plate

Contributed by: St. J Dixon-Warren and Rajesh Krishnamurthy

The much anticipated Memjet printhead, developed by Sydney, Australia-based Silverbrook Research, has finally arrived in the Chipworks labs. It has been a long time coming and the subject of a wide ranging array of blogs over the last 5 or so years. Printheads have been an area of interest for Chipworks and we were eager to compare this new technology with that offered by the major players in the ink jet printer industry, namely Hewlett Packard, Canon, Kodak, and Lexmark.

Demonstration of the MEMJet Printer vs a standard ink jet

These major players all use essentially the same technology platform for their printhead devices. The technology is based on CMOS die with integrated heater firing resistors, typically made with tantalum-based material. Microfluidic channels and nozzles are then fabricated in a post-CMOS process flow. The heater sits like a hot plate beneath the ink cavity. Two methods are used for fabricating the microfluidic structures. The earlier method, originally developed by Hewlett Packard in the late 1980’s, used an orifice place affixed over an ink barrier layer, while the later method was based on lithographic patterning. Both Canon and HP have developed a process using lithographic pattering of tough SU-8 epoxy-based photoresist material, while Kodak used organic and oxide-based layers to define the ink cavity and nozzles. The surface of the die, within the heater cavity, is sometimes protected with a thick tantalum cavitation layer, which serves to protect the die from damage caused by the boiling ink.

Nozzle plate and ink cavity in the HP60 printhead

Lithographic nozzle and ink cavity in the Canon PF-01 printhead

Lithographic nozzle and ink cavity in the Kodak 6J2032 printhead

Lithographic nozzle and ink cavity detail in the Kodak 6J2032 printhead

The Memjet printer analyzed by Chipworks was the Rapid X1 inkjet label printer, designed and manufactured by Rapid Machinery Company of Chatswood, New South Wales, Australia. The RapidX1 printer is designed for high speed color label printing and is a roll-to-roll printer with capacity to wind and unwind a 12” (305 mm) outer diameter roll and print with a print resolution of 1600 dpi x 1600 dpi. The printer also has an optical sensor to pre-cut and strip labels. The printer used in conjunction with the Memjet ML210700 printhead can print continuously at a maximum speed of 12 inches per second at 1600 dpi x 800 dpi. The Memjet ML210700 five color printhead contains cyan, magenta, yellow, and two black (CMYKK) dye-based inks. The Memjet ML210700 die spans the width of an A4 page and prints the entire page in one pass compared to traditional printheads which move repeatedly across the width of the page to print.

Rapid X1 Printer

Memjet ML210700 printhead

The Memjet printhead is based on a new MEMS-based technology. The ink nozzles are fabricated using micro-machined oxide and nitride films. The critical difference, however, is that the heater is no longer embedded within the CMOS die, but rather it is formed as a suspended “air bridge” structure within the ink cavity. The heater is like that found in an electric tea kettle, since it is surrounded by the ink.

Printhead nozzles on the Memjet ML210700

The Memjet printhead is built using a post-CMOS MEMS process flow. The four-metal 0.5 µm CMOS die was likely fabricated at TSMC.  The microfluidic ink cavity and nozzles would then have been formed over the CMOS, with the heater resistor being connected electrically to the metal 4 layer. Deep reactive ion etching (DRIE) would then have been used to form the ink vias from the backside of the die. The final step would have been release of the sacrificial material within the ink cavity.

Nozzle and ink cavity in the Memjet printhead

Many industry analysts have considered the printhead industry to be mature, with relatively little scope for innovation. The business is driven by marketing and cost control. In addition, the major players work aggressively to prevent new entrants, both through the use of intellectual property, and through the use of security technology that prevents the use of aftermarket printheads in their printers. The printer business market is unusual, in that the actual printers are sold at a discount, with all the profit being earned on the sale of consumables, mainly the printhead modules. We thus get the odd situation that it is sometimes cheaper to buy a new printer than to buy new printhead cartridges for an existing printer.

The Memjet printhead represents a major new innovation in printhead technology. The products are so new on the market that it is not clear whether this new technology brings sufficient benefits to disrupt the business of the major players in this market space.

Related Chipworks reports:

CES Report – Invensense winning some impressive new designs

Friday, January 7th, 2011 by Dick James

After a morning of roaming the halls looking at new phones, tablets and cameras I finally got into the hall where the semiconductor giants who power all of these new consumer toys were exhibiting. They are all here; Qualcomm, Intel, Marvel, Atheros, Texas Instruments, Synaptics, Invensense and Atmel to name a few. These exhibitors show off their chipsets by way of demonstrating many of the same new toys found on the other floors. They also exhibit their newest and recently, or soon to be released, devices in mock ups of products that will soon come to market.

I’ll start with Invensense, a supplier of MEMS inertial sensors.

In our recent blog and teardown articles we have made much of STMicroelectronics success in the inertial sensor market because they had design wins in several recent flagship products. But the other players have been able to score some big successes also in this rapidly growing MEMS market. This includes smaller, more focused companies like Invensense, at who’s suite I had a chance to visit with Mike Housholder, Director of Marketing, and David Almoslino, Product Marketing Director.

I saw some recent design wins for the ITG-3200 3 axis MEMS gyroscope – on which we have done several reports. For instance; LG has incorporated the ITG-3200 into their TV remote controls, the remote control points to menu buttons on the screen much like a Wii mote operates. Other design wins discussed were the new LG Optimus Black. The Optimus Black was just announced at CES, making it a really good example for Invensense to be showing off. I had a chance to see this phone in action and it is yet another example of the already widely reported, full court press against Apple’s dominance in the touchscreen smartphone space.  Good for Invensense is that several reviewers have already been impressed with the way the 9 degrees of motion sensing is used by the UI for the Optimus Black.

LG Optimus Black

Another great design win for the Invensense ITG-3200 is the brand new, just announced at CES 2011, Acer Iconia Tab A500.

Acer Iconica Tab A500
(Image sourced from:tomshardware.com)

While Invensense seems to have gained some very good traction with their mature ITG products, they have not sat back and rested on these wins. Instead they have been very busy designing their new MPU-3000 and MPU-6000 series which they are now demonstrating to would-be customers. The MPU-3000 is a 3 axis gyro and the MPU-6000 is a six axis (X,Y, Z and Roll Pitch and Yaw) all into one MEMS device. That’s right. Not two separate MEMS sensors in one package, but according to Invensense, all six degrees of motion are in one MEMS device with an intelligent ASIC lid.

I am sure my colleagues back in the process lab will be looking forward to getting this device and taking some SEM image of the structures on this MPU-6000. In the way of design wins for the new MPU line of MEMS devices, Invensense tells us we should see products on the market this year that utlize these innovation packed devices. Way to go guys. Keep up the great work.

Next we’ll be discussing touch screen controllers for phones and tablets.

Apple Uses Nine Degrees-of-Freedom Sensing in the iPhone 4

Wednesday, August 25th, 2010 by chipworks

contributed by St.J. Dixon-Warren, MEMS Sector Analyst

The iPhone 4 is the first portable consumer device to feature full nine degree-of-freedom (9-DoF) inertial sensing. Apple have done this by integrating a three-axis accelerometer and a three-axis gyroscope from STMicroelectronics (ST), together with an electronic compass from AKM.  The iPhone product line has moved steadily towards this goal with each successive model. Steve Nasiri and his Invensense colleagues discussed the benefits of 9-DoF sensing in some detail in a recent Whitepaper.

The original 2G iPhone, released in 2007, featured an ST 3 mm x 5 mm LIS302DL three-axis accelerometer. This provided the screen orientation function, by using the acceleration of gravity to determine the orientation, and it was also available to “app” developers for simple games. The iPhone 3G also only contained an accelerometer, but in this case Apple used the 3 mm x 3mm LIS331DL MEMS device, also from ST. Next up, the iPhone 3GS added digital compass capability by adding an AKM AK8973 electronic compass.  This provided improved GPS location functionality, even though (as described on an AKM web site) it required regular recalibration by waving the phone in a figure-eight motion  – no, it’s not a tai-chi app!

The iPhone 4 features an ST LIS331DLH three-axis accelerometer and an AKM AK8975 three-axis electronic compass. To get the 9-DoF, Apple added an ST L3G4200D three-axis gyroscope sensor, packaged in a 4 mm x 4 mm LGA package.

Chipworks has examined all of the inertial sensors found in the iPhone product family and detailed reverse engineering analysis reports are now available. The following is a summary of our findings for the sensors found in the iPhone 4.

MEMS Sensors

According to ST the LIS331DLH is an ultra-low power, digital three-axis accelerometer. The package contains two stacked die, a V583A ASIC with 2007 die marks and a MEMS die with C5L12B 2008 die marks. Figure 1 shows the MEMS die, with its hermetic cap removed, illustrating the integrated XY sensor structure and a Z-axis sensor structure.

The XY sensor uses interdigitated finger capacitors to sense the motion of a proof mass that is constrained to move in the XY plane, while the Z sensor uses an underlying capacitor plate to sense vertical deflection of a proof mass mounted on a torsion spring. ST fabricated the part using their well-established THELMA process (Thick Epi-Poly Layer for Micro-actuators and Accelerometers). The THELMA process uses a thick top polysilicon layer (poly 2) to form the micro-machined electro-mechanical structures plus a thin buried polysilicon layer (poly 1) for connection to the bond pads, as well as for the bottom capacitor plate of the Z-sensor.

LIS331DLH MEMS Die Photograph thumb

Figure 1 – ST Microelectronics LIS331DLH MEMS Die (click to enlarge)

The L3G4200D is also fabricated using essentially the same manufacturing process as is used for the LIS331DLH. The L3G4200D package contains a V654A ASIC, with 2009 die markings, stacked above a capped, integrated MEMS gyroscope die, which has GK10A 2009 die markings.  The L3G4200D is essentially a tuning fork vibrational gyroscope, where vibrational energy imparted to one degree-of-freedom of the mechanical structure is transferred to an orthogonal degree-of-freedom by rotation around an axis perpendicular to both the drive and sense modes of the device. Integrating three rotation sense axis into a single device represents a significant engineering achievement by ST.

Figure 2 is a photograph of the L3G4200D die. Banks of interdigitated drive capacitors, located on the left and right hand sides of the die, induce vibration of the tuning fork proof mass structures (see Figure 3). Rotation around the X and Y axis in the plane of the die (pitch and roll) cause an out-of-plane deflection of the proof mass. The poly 1 capacitor plates (beneath the proof mass, in Fig. 4) sense the deflections. Rotation around the Z axis (yaw) gives in an in-plane deflection, sensed by interdigitated capacitor plates located along the top and bottom edge of the die.

L3G4200D MEMS Die Photograph thumb

Figure 2 – L3G4200D MEMS Die (click to enlarge)

L3G4200D MEMS Structures thumb

Figure 3 – L3G4200D MEMS Structures (click to enlarge)

L3G4200D Buried Poly 1 MEMS Die Photograph thumb

Figure 4 – L3G4200D Buried Poly 1 MEMS Die (click to enlarge)

AKM Compass

The AK8975 found in the iPhone 4 is similar to the AK8973 found in the iPhone 3GS, although the 3GS part used a QFN package while the iPhone 4 compass used a wafer-level chip-scale-package (WL-CSP).

The AKM electronic compasses use integrated CMOS Hall sensor technology.  Figure 5 shows the AK8975 die photograph; the Hall sensor structure is near the bottom left corner of the die. It comprises four discrete Hall sensor devices, one for each quadrant of the approximately circular structure. A metal solenoid coil lies within the open area between the Hall sensor devices. Detailed inspection confirmed that the Hall sensor devices on the AK8975 are identical to those used on the AK8973.

AK8975 Die Photograph thumb

Figure 5 – AK8975 Die (click to enlarge)

Hall devices are sensitive only to the component of the magnetic field vector perpendicular to the surface of the die. The AKM electronic compass products thus incorporate a magnetic concentrator that serves to bend magnetic field lines parallel to the die surface, to obtain a component perpendicular to the surface. Figure 6 presents a plan-view X-ray of the 2 mm x 2mm AK8975, indicating the location of the magnetic concentrator.

AK8975 WL-CSP Package X-ray thumb

Figure 6 – AK8975 WL-CSP Package X-Ray (click to enlarge)

Cross-sectional analysis of the packaged AK8975 shows that the magnetic concentrator, formed using a FeNi alloy, is mounted beneath the die (Fig. 7). The location of the Hall Sensor device and the solenoid coil are indicated on the micrograph.

AK8975 Magnetic Concentrator Cross Section thumb

Figure 7 – AK8975 Magnetic Concentrator Cross-Section (click to enlarge)

The integration of 9-DoF sensing into the iPhone 4 will, with certainty, enable new applications. The inclusion of the gyroscope raises the accuracy of motion sensing, for example for gesture recognition, while the incorporation of the compass improves navigation functionality.

The iPhone 4 has many other sensors, which incidentally is perhaps why it is so popular. The specifications on the Apple web site disclose the digital compass, gyroscope and accelerometer, discussed above, plus an LED-based proximity sensor and an LCD-based ambient light sensor that control the power to the screen, and multiple microphone sensors. Chipworks found three MEMS microphones, a Knowles and an Infineon inside the iPhone 4, plus another Knowles microphone in the ear bud wires.

The dominant sensor on the iPhone is, of course, the touch screen. This sophisticated sensor uses an Apple-branded 343S0499 Texas Instruments touch screen controller.

Finally, the iPhone 4 includes two OmniVision CMOS image sensor cameras, and OV5650 backside-illuminated (BSI) image sensor for the primary camera and a VGA secondary camera, likely the OV7738.

A question of interest is what new sensors will Apple include next? Possibilities might include a pressure sensor for barometric pressure and altitude measurements, although in this case the benefits to the user might be marginal.

It may be the case that Apple has exhausted the ranged of sensors that would provide significant benefit to the users. The iPhone 4 provides functionality that corresponds to three of the five the human senses including vision, hearing and touch. Is it likely that we would want our iPhone to be able to taste and smell?

Recent Chipworks reports referencing technology found in the iPhone

Report Report Code
STMicroelectronics LIS331DL Accelerometer MEMS Process Review MPR-0809-802
STMicroelectronics LIS331DL 3-Axis Accelerometer Layout Analysis (ICWorks Surveyor) ICS-0809-802
STMicroelectronics LIS331DLH 3-Axis MEMS Accelerometer Exploratory Report EXR-0903-801
STMicroelectronics LIS331DLH Three-Axis MEMS Accelerometer Layout Analysis (ICWorks Surveyor) ICS-0903-801
STMicroelectronics L3G4200D MEMS Three-Axis Gyroscope Exploratory Report EXR-1006-802
STMicroelectronics L3G4200D MEMS Three-Axis Gyroscope Layout Analysis (ICWorks Surveyor) ICS-1006-801
AKM Semiconductor AK8973 & AK8974 Hall-Effect 3-Axis Electronic Compass Devices MEMS Process Review MPR-0910-801
AKM AK8975 Electronic Compass Exploratory Report EXR-1007-804
AKM Semiconductor AK8973 Hall-Effect Magnetic Electronic Device Circuit Analysis CAR-1001-801